In alignment with the goals and priorities of Prince George's County Public Schools (PGCPS), the School Performance Plan (SPP) allows for a transparent and collaborative school improvement process with a focus on student achievement.
The School Performance Plan was developed this school year as the continuation of the detailed work and planning completed in the previous school year. The SPP focuses schools on engaging in disciplined inquiry cycles through the use of Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA). Through the successful utilization of PDSA, schools are able to impact student achievement and teacher practice by taking a scientific approach to school improvement.
|
SCHOOL PROFILE |
|
|
|
|
School Name: |
LAUREL ELEMENTARY |
||
|
School Year: |
2026 |
Area: |
Area-1 |
|
Local Education Agency: |
Prince Georges County Public Schools |
Supervisor Name: |
Haughton-Williams, Judith C |
|
State School No.: |
1001 |
Supervisor Email: |
|
|
School Type: |
04. Elementary School |
Title I: |
Yes |
|
Grades Served: |
0PK, 05 |
Community School: |
Yes |
|
Principal Name: |
Tyrone Harris |
State Identification: |
CSI:No, TSI/ATSI:Yes |
|
Principal Email: |
|
|
|
|
School Address: |
516 MONTGOMERY St, LAUREL,MD - , LAUREL MD 20707 |
||
|
School Vision: |
All students (100%) will reach proficiency in reading and math, as measured by grade-level standards on county and state assessments, through rigorous instruction and targeted support. |
||
|
School Mission: |
At Laurel Elementary, our mission is to empower every student to achieve academic excellence in reading and math by providing rigorous instruction, targeted support, and a nurturing environment. We are committed to fostering a culture of high expectations, equity, and collaboration so that all students reach grade-level proficiency and develop the skills needed to thrive as lifelong learners and leaders. |
||
1
|
SMART Goals A targeted aspiration that serves as the focal point for collective improvement efforts Specific; Measurable; Achievable; Realistic; Timebound |
||
|
Math- By the end of Cycle 1, at least 50% of teachers will consistently present the problem, provide wait time, record student responses, summarize student thoughts, and address misconceptions during math lessons |
RELA/ELA-By the end of Cycle 1, 70% of teachers will consistently integrate targeted vocabulary instruction with accompanying visuals during lessons and maintain visible and accessible vocabulary resources. |
Culture and Climate-By the end of Cycle 1, 100% of staff will consistently greet students at the door at the start of each day and make weekly positive communications home (calls or notes), as documented through walkthroughs and communication logs. |
|
Problem of Practice One problem the school has chosen to address that will assist them in moving toward the overarching Smart Goal |
||
|
Student performance data on the SY25 MCAP math assessment shows that students are struggling most with grade-level content. Inconsistent Tier 1 instruction limits access to rigorous, standards-aligned teaching, impacting overall student proficiency and growth. |
Student performance data on the SY25 MCAP reading assessment indicates that vocabulary development is the area of need, significantly impacting overall reading proficiency and students' ability to access grade-level texts. |
Staff and community survey data reveal inconsistencies in the implementation of behavior expectations, recognition systems, and restorative practices across the school. |
|
Change Idea A specific, actionable idea or technique that school teams will use to address the SMART Goal |
||
|
Implementation of daily math talks with fidelity. |
Explicit Vocabulary Instruction |
Implement PBIS (Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports) as a consistent, schoolwide structure to promote a positive, predictable, and supportive climate for all students and staff. |
|
Target |
||
|
The AIM set to determine if the implementation of the change idea was successful |
||
|
By the end of Cycle 1, at least 50% of teachers will consistently implement math talks using the following criteria: present the problem, provide wait time, record student responses, summarize student thoughts, and address misconceptions during math lessons, as observed in walkthroughs. |
**By the end of Cycle 1, 70% of teachers will consistently integrate targeted vocabulary instruction with accompanying visuals during lessons, as observed in at least two walkthroughs per month. In addition, each classroom will maintain visible and accessible vocabulary resources (e.g., anchor charts, student vocabulary journals, and vocabulary walls) that reflect current instructional units, verified through classroom walkthroughs.** |
By the end of Cycle 1, 100% of staff will consistently greet students at the door at the start of each day and make weekly positive communications home (calls or notes), as documented through walkthroughs and communication logs |
|
By the end of Cycle 1, at least 50% of students will explain their math reasoning orally or in writing using accurate mathematical vocabulary and demonstrate conceptual understanding, as observed in walkthroughs. |
By the end of Cycle 1, at least 50% of students will accurately use targeted vocabulary orally or in writing during instructional activities, as evidenced by student work samples, discussion transcripts, or formative assessments. Students will also independently reference available vocabulary resources (e.g., anchor charts, vocabulary journals, vocabulary walls) during learning tasks. |
By the end of Cycle 1, 70% of students will be greeted at the door at the start of each day by their teacher and will receive a positive communication home (calls or notes), as documented through walkthroughs and communication logs. |
|
Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI) / Additional Targeted Support and Improvement (ATSI) This section is for state-identified schools only. |
||
|
Identified Group(s) |
Evidence-Based Strategy (EBS) |
EBS Target |
|
Students with Disabilities |
Students will develop a deeper understanding of abstract mathematical concepts through the implementation of the **Concrete–Representational–Abstract (CRA) Model**, an evidence-based instructional strategy. Using this approach, students will first engage with **concrete materials** such as blocks, counters, or base-ten manipulatives to build foundational understanding. They will then transition to **representational (semi-concrete) models**, including diagrams, drawings, and number lines, to visualize mathematical |
By the end of Cycle 1, 60% of special education students will demonstrate growth in applying abstract mathematical concepts by accurately solving single- and multi-step word problems with **70% proficiency or higher**, as measured by classroom assessments, Leadership walkthroughs, and IEP-aligned progress monitoring tools. This will be supported through structured use of manipulatives (e.g., blocks, counters) and semi-concrete representations (e.g., diagrams, number lines), with scaffolded teacher support |
|
|
relationships. Finally, students will move to the **abstract stage**, applying symbols and equations to solve problems independently. This gradual progression will strengthen conceptual understanding, promote problem-solving skills, and build students' confidence in applying mathematical procedures. |
to build independence and confidence in transitioning from concrete to abstract problem-solving. |